Bill O'reilly

By Anonymous -
Below is a quote from Bill O'Reilly's 1998 suspense thriller novel Those Who Trespass about “a serial killer who will exact revenge on everyone who has sabotaged his rising TV career.”

...Ashley was now wearing only brief white panties. She had signaled her desire by removing her shirt and skirt, and by leaning back on the couch. She closed her eyes, concentrating on nothing but Shannon’s tongue and lips. He gently teased her by licking the areas around her most sensitive erogenous zone. Then he slipped her panties down her legs and, within seconds, his tongue was inside her, moving rapidly...

Does this sound like a guy who could suggest that his FoxNews producer Andrew Mackris purchase a vibrator and name it, further explaining that he had one “shaped like a cock with a little battery in it” that a woman had given—keep in mind that he is pleasuring himself while stating this on a recorded phone conversation. Maybe O'Reilly could teach Clinton a thing or two. Is he married?

Point you ask. When blogging consider sources from people like Bill O'Reilly and other right-wingers who preach the bible and then demean 1/2 the world's population. I wonder what his wife Maureen and his daughter think about this.

Does O'Reilly respect woman? I wonder if he would have done as well writing porn scripts. No..they probably would have made him a fluffer.


Steve

Comments

Bob Cat said…
__________________
Bob Comments:
1. I am glad to see that your reading interests branch beyond politics.
2. I haven't had the pleasure of reading Mr. O'Reilly's literary effort. Are you arguing that including sexually explicit material in a novel is demeaning to all women? This hardly seem to follow to me. Practically every novel published these days, including many aimed at women ("bodice rippers" and "Historical Romances") fall in this category.
3. As to whether O'Reilly is guilty as accused, if you don't mind, I think I will postpone judgment and hear what the evidence is from both sides.
___________________________________
6:47 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How About Kids Accounts?

By -
posted by Bob Clasen Mr. President, Let's Share the Wealth By DAVID BROOKS Published: February 8, 2005 President Bush said he was open to other people's ideas on how to fix Social Security, so I hope he'll listen to mine. My idea starts with a blunt political observation. Personal accounts - as they are currently envisioned - are going to be hard to pass. Every important Democrat opposes them. Jim McCrery, the Republican who is chairman of the House Social Security subcommittee, says the president's plan will have to fundamentally change if it is to have a chance. So my idea is this: If the president's current version of personal accounts stalls, he should consider another version - one that is more likely to win broad support, and that achieves all the goals of an "ownership society." The personal accounts I'm thinking of would be inspired by a proposal called KidSave, which was floating around in the late 1990's. KidSave wa...
Read more

Democrat Party: "Dependency-Bureaucracy Complex"

By -
by George Will ____________________________ If Sept. 11 had never happened -- if debate about domestic policy had not been drowned out by the roar of war -- the potential domestic ramifications of this election would give it unusual nation-shaping power. To understand why is to understand some of the Democratic rage about the specter of a second term for George W. Bush. He has a multifaceted agenda for weakening crucial components of the Democratic Party, factions that depend on cosseting by the federal government. Consider trial lawyers and organized labor. John Kerry's selection of John Edwards as running mate was a blunder, and not just because Kerry probably will lose Edwards's North Carolina. The Edwards selection ratifies a provocative fact: trial lawyers have become the Democrats' most important faction. This has energized small-business owners, the self-employed, doctors and others who worry that they live one lawsuit away from ruin. Such people, now arous...
Read more

Victory in Fallujah

By -
_____________________ by Ralph Peters New York Post November 11, 2004 -- IN the Second Battle of Fallujah, military operations are ahead of schedule. Our casualties have been blessedly light. The terrorists who haven't fled are being killed by the hundreds. Our troops will soon achieve their goal of eliminating Iraq's key safe haven for terrorists. Our Marines and soldiers have carried the ball inside the 10-yard line. The media's response? Move the goalposts. The legions of pundits ("Will talk for food") now suggest that a win in Fallujah will be meaningless because we failed to kill or capture the terrorist leadership, because some of the thugs ran away and because Fallujah won't resemble Darien, Conn., by next Sunday. On Tuesday, as our troops handily pierced the defenses terrorists had spent months erecting, The New York Times carried two front-page stories implying that our forces were facing possible defeat. The Times' military analysis...
Read more