Fearless Leader

By -
Bob:

I haven't seen you defending fearless leader much recently. Was the Scooter Libby revelation too much for you.? Or as I suspect, you are waiting for the rapture along with the current administration.

I for one plan to be around for a while, I think the constant revising of the truth by this administration has to be made a central issue of public debate. Don't you expect more from your public leaders than what we have now.

Comments

Bob Cat said…
I have been distracted by the exciting details of the Angelina Jolie Brad Pitt romance.

Seriously, I am reading a book called "Collapse" by Jared Diamond, which is interesting. It examines how past civilizations that have disappeared have made similar mistakes: deforestation, short term thinking, mutually destructive wars, etc.

I enjoy Jared Diamong because he discusses issues such as environmentalism and big business, which can be very divisive topics, with a calm, dispassionate analysis apart from the usual political rhetoric. As a result, he actually sheds light on these problems and points a way towards genuine solutions. While political mudslinging and propaganda such as conducted by Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken can be entertaining, they do not help me to think through real problems or make any progress. Rather than defending Bush or the Republicans, I find it more interesting to consider issues with a view towards finding a solution.

I am considering reading "The World is Flat" next. Any suggestions?
9:47 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anger Management

By -
Image
   Isn't it interesting that Religion and Politics are taboo topics in polite company?  These are very important to many people, but discussing them only seems to provoke anger in most people.  The exception seems to be that people of similar opinions can discuss with one another how much they hate, desipise, and laugh at those of different beliefs.   Apparently, religions and politics are not subjects that most people desire to consider in a calm, cool, rational manner.  Rather, for most people, religion and politics are emotional topics.  They are the subject of Faith.  People have faith in their religion.  More surprisingly, (at least to me) they have Faith in their politics.  Faith and Reason are like oil and water; they do not mix.   I am not restricting my comments to stupid people or any particular party.  My observation seems true to me of very intelligent members of various parties (although there does seems to be a tendency to judge members of parties to which you do not
Read more

War on Terror

By -
Image
by Bob Clasen Currently, the Administration is trying to wage a War on Terror. But Terror is not an entity. It is a method of warfare, like automatic weapons, or aircraft. One cannot wage war against a technique or technology. I suggest that what is needed is not more soldiers to be sent to Iraq, but greater clarity of thought. Who, exactly, is our enemy? It would appear that one of America's enemies is Fundamentalist Islam. Why is Fundamentalist Islam our enemy? Because Fundamentalist Islam defines unbelievers as infidel and urges its members to wage war against them. This is the doctrine of jihad. The problem is not with extremisist who hijacked a peaceful religion. The problem is the doctrine of Jihad, or Holy War is found throughout the Koran. This doctrine can be re-interpreted by modern liberal types as a psychological warfare against one's own sins, but that is not how many people throughout history have interpreted it. Anyone who is given to literal interpret
Read more

Victory in Fallujah

By -
_____________________ by Ralph Peters New York Post November 11, 2004 -- IN the Second Battle of Fallujah, military operations are ahead of schedule. Our casualties have been blessedly light. The terrorists who haven't fled are being killed by the hundreds. Our troops will soon achieve their goal of eliminating Iraq's key safe haven for terrorists. Our Marines and soldiers have carried the ball inside the 10-yard line. The media's response? Move the goalposts. The legions of pundits ("Will talk for food") now suggest that a win in Fallujah will be meaningless because we failed to kill or capture the terrorist leadership, because some of the thugs ran away and because Fallujah won't resemble Darien, Conn., by next Sunday. On Tuesday, as our troops handily pierced the defenses terrorists had spent months erecting, The New York Times carried two front-page stories implying that our forces were facing possible defeat. The Times' military analysis
Read more