Difficult Choices

By -

October 24, 2006

The Bush goal: to bring democracy and a more secular government to Iraq. In the history of conflict between civilisations, this would be a remarkable accomplishment. It would plant the flag of freedom in the heart of the Mideast and give so called moderate Muslims a hope for something from their culture but dictatorship and a return to the dark ages of intolerance.

The price is high, (but historically not high when compared with prior wars: Civil War, World Wars, Korean War or Vietnam War).

I think it fair to criticize the tactics used in Iraq, IF you have some better suggestions. But I do not think the policy of simply abandoning Iraq to the forces of chaos and violent Jihad is the better choice.

We would like to believe that what happens in Afghanistan or Iraq has no relevance to us in America. But this is increasingly untrue. We live in one world, and as the world's only Superpower, we cannot put our head in the sand, or put our hands over our eyes about the growing Islamo fascist threat.

Another approach advocated by some is to give up on Moderate Muslims and consider that we are now at war with all of Islam. Is this better than trying to hold Iraq together?

The Democrats may get elected even though they have really failed to articulate their own vision.

by Bob Clasen

Comments

J.D. Kessler said…
Bob:

As far as I am concerned, moderate Muslims deserve the government they permit. With the exception of a couple of Muslim dominated countries, there is no tradition of democratic rule.

I think the problem in Iraq is greatly accelerated by our presense in the Middle East. We are not liberators, we are infidel invaders regardless of what label we choose to put on ourselves. If we can get out and keep Iran from turning part of Iraq into a puppet state, I think we should let the Iraqis sort this out themselves.

We blindly think we offer a desirable alternative to authoritarian rule or a theocracy, but we just give all factions a target to blame for their own problems.

I think the generals should figure out how to extract our troops but still prevent the Iranians from taking over. I would set a time table for the current government and tell them that Iranian intervention will cause us to return. Give them six months to get their act together, consolidate our forces in easily defended locations, stop providing security, and let the Iraqis settle this themselves.

To show we mean it, pull out 20,000 troops so they get the message. If the great moderate middle doesn't like what is going on this will be a big wakeup call to them.
9:57 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How About Kids Accounts?

By -
posted by Bob Clasen Mr. President, Let's Share the Wealth By DAVID BROOKS Published: February 8, 2005 President Bush said he was open to other people's ideas on how to fix Social Security, so I hope he'll listen to mine. My idea starts with a blunt political observation. Personal accounts - as they are currently envisioned - are going to be hard to pass. Every important Democrat opposes them. Jim McCrery, the Republican who is chairman of the House Social Security subcommittee, says the president's plan will have to fundamentally change if it is to have a chance. So my idea is this: If the president's current version of personal accounts stalls, he should consider another version - one that is more likely to win broad support, and that achieves all the goals of an "ownership society." The personal accounts I'm thinking of would be inspired by a proposal called KidSave, which was floating around in the late 1990's. KidSave wa...
Read more

Democrat Party: "Dependency-Bureaucracy Complex"

By -
by George Will ____________________________ If Sept. 11 had never happened -- if debate about domestic policy had not been drowned out by the roar of war -- the potential domestic ramifications of this election would give it unusual nation-shaping power. To understand why is to understand some of the Democratic rage about the specter of a second term for George W. Bush. He has a multifaceted agenda for weakening crucial components of the Democratic Party, factions that depend on cosseting by the federal government. Consider trial lawyers and organized labor. John Kerry's selection of John Edwards as running mate was a blunder, and not just because Kerry probably will lose Edwards's North Carolina. The Edwards selection ratifies a provocative fact: trial lawyers have become the Democrats' most important faction. This has energized small-business owners, the self-employed, doctors and others who worry that they live one lawsuit away from ruin. Such people, now arous...
Read more

Victory in Fallujah

By -
_____________________ by Ralph Peters New York Post November 11, 2004 -- IN the Second Battle of Fallujah, military operations are ahead of schedule. Our casualties have been blessedly light. The terrorists who haven't fled are being killed by the hundreds. Our troops will soon achieve their goal of eliminating Iraq's key safe haven for terrorists. Our Marines and soldiers have carried the ball inside the 10-yard line. The media's response? Move the goalposts. The legions of pundits ("Will talk for food") now suggest that a win in Fallujah will be meaningless because we failed to kill or capture the terrorist leadership, because some of the thugs ran away and because Fallujah won't resemble Darien, Conn., by next Sunday. On Tuesday, as our troops handily pierced the defenses terrorists had spent months erecting, The New York Times carried two front-page stories implying that our forces were facing possible defeat. The Times' military analysis...
Read more