Separate Church and State?

By -


Many liberals are terrified at the slightest incroachment of government into religion, such as placing a Christmas tree at City Hall, or printing "In God We Trust" on the back of a dollar.

Such liberals should examine the history of Islam. Islam has no tolerance for the idea that church and state should be separate. Islam assumes that the Church and state should be one and that all citizens should be governed by Islamic law, or Sharia.

If Moslems get their way, the separation of church and state will become a thing of the past.

The one thing that can sometimes bring groups in conflict together is their mutual perception of a shared threat. Why is it that liberals remain oblivious of the danger of radical political Islam to their cherished liberal ideals?

Freedom of speech does not exist under Sharia law. Criticizing Mohammad is a death penalty offense. Nor does freedom of religion exist under Sharia law. In fact, infidels are tolerated; allowed to live only as second class citizens if they pay a "poll tax."

Once you convert to Islam, you're freedom of religion ends. Changing your mind to believe in any other kind of religion besides Islam, or atheism, is called Apostasy. The crime of apostasy is a capital offense under Sharia law.

Rights for minorities such as homosexuals are not respected by Islam. Islam has sanctioned the murder of homosexuals and also sanctioned stoning women (but rarely men) for adultery.

Sharia is the ultimate Anti-Liberal set of laws.

So why are liberals so unconcerned? Why do they feel that Bush and Cheney are the problem, not Islam? Perhaps liberals has suffered some damage to their instinct for survival?

It is a complete mystery to me.

Bob Clasen

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anger Management

By -
Image
   Isn't it interesting that Religion and Politics are taboo topics in polite company?  These are very important to many people, but discussing them only seems to provoke anger in most people.  The exception seems to be that people of similar opinions can discuss with one another how much they hate, desipise, and laugh at those of different beliefs.   Apparently, religions and politics are not subjects that most people desire to consider in a calm, cool, rational manner.  Rather, for most people, religion and politics are emotional topics.  They are the subject of Faith.  People have faith in their religion.  More surprisingly, (at least to me) they have Faith in their politics.  Faith and Reason are like oil and water; they do not mix.   I am not restricting my comments to stupid people or any particular party.  My observation seems true to me of very intelligent members of various parties (although there does seems to be a tendency to judge members of parties to which you do not
Read more

War on Terror

By -
Image
by Bob Clasen Currently, the Administration is trying to wage a War on Terror. But Terror is not an entity. It is a method of warfare, like automatic weapons, or aircraft. One cannot wage war against a technique or technology. I suggest that what is needed is not more soldiers to be sent to Iraq, but greater clarity of thought. Who, exactly, is our enemy? It would appear that one of America's enemies is Fundamentalist Islam. Why is Fundamentalist Islam our enemy? Because Fundamentalist Islam defines unbelievers as infidel and urges its members to wage war against them. This is the doctrine of jihad. The problem is not with extremisist who hijacked a peaceful religion. The problem is the doctrine of Jihad, or Holy War is found throughout the Koran. This doctrine can be re-interpreted by modern liberal types as a psychological warfare against one's own sins, but that is not how many people throughout history have interpreted it. Anyone who is given to literal interpret
Read more

Victory in Fallujah

By -
_____________________ by Ralph Peters New York Post November 11, 2004 -- IN the Second Battle of Fallujah, military operations are ahead of schedule. Our casualties have been blessedly light. The terrorists who haven't fled are being killed by the hundreds. Our troops will soon achieve their goal of eliminating Iraq's key safe haven for terrorists. Our Marines and soldiers have carried the ball inside the 10-yard line. The media's response? Move the goalposts. The legions of pundits ("Will talk for food") now suggest that a win in Fallujah will be meaningless because we failed to kill or capture the terrorist leadership, because some of the thugs ran away and because Fallujah won't resemble Darien, Conn., by next Sunday. On Tuesday, as our troops handily pierced the defenses terrorists had spent months erecting, The New York Times carried two front-page stories implying that our forces were facing possible defeat. The Times' military analysis
Read more